<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Next Opening Days</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelosscolumn.com/2009/the-next-opening-days/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelosscolumn.com/2009/the-next-opening-days/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:57:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.thelosscolumn.com/2009/the-next-opening-days/comment-page-1/#comment-28295</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelosscolumn.com/?p=3184#comment-28295</guid>
		<description>All I mean is someone with some desire to sign quickly.  I&#039;d imagine that Crow wouldn&#039;t want to drag things out for a second straight year.  Just a hypothetical.

How can Crow be considered #41 when he was easily top 10 last year?  The debate was whether Matusz or Crow was a better bet for a college pitcher.  Would we assume that if Brian Matusz were in the draft this year, he&#039;d be top 50 instead of top 10, too?

Sounds fishy to me.  But again, I haven&#039;t put too much thought into the draft yet.  Of course, I&#039;ve heard who the top 10 or so guys are likely to be, but I haven&#039;t looekd into it.

In regards to the prep pitcher thing - I believe Bill James once looked at prep versus college in the draft and basically said the success rate is roughly even as long as you don&#039;t foolishly give a prep pitcher a major league contract (cough...Loewen...cough).  Naturally, prep players take longer to develop though. I&#039;ll try to find that article he wrote, it&#039;s in a book I have somewhere around here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I mean is someone with some desire to sign quickly.  I&#8217;d imagine that Crow wouldn&#8217;t want to drag things out for a second straight year.  Just a hypothetical.</p>
<p>How can Crow be considered #41 when he was easily top 10 last year?  The debate was whether Matusz or Crow was a better bet for a college pitcher.  Would we assume that if Brian Matusz were in the draft this year, he&#8217;d be top 50 instead of top 10, too?</p>
<p>Sounds fishy to me.  But again, I haven&#8217;t put too much thought into the draft yet.  Of course, I&#8217;ve heard who the top 10 or so guys are likely to be, but I haven&#8217;t looekd into it.</p>
<p>In regards to the prep pitcher thing &#8211; I believe Bill James once looked at prep versus college in the draft and basically said the success rate is roughly even as long as you don&#8217;t foolishly give a prep pitcher a major league contract (cough&#8230;Loewen&#8230;cough).  Naturally, prep players take longer to develop though. I&#8217;ll try to find that article he wrote, it&#8217;s in a book I have somewhere around here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neal s</title>
		<link>http://www.thelosscolumn.com/2009/the-next-opening-days/comment-page-1/#comment-28293</link>
		<dc:creator>neal s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelosscolumn.com/?p=3184#comment-28293</guid>
		<description>Take that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Baseball Intelligence</title>
		<link>http://www.thelosscolumn.com/2009/the-next-opening-days/comment-page-1/#comment-28292</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Baseball Intelligence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelosscolumn.com/?p=3184#comment-28292</guid>
		<description>Real Baseball Intelligence (RBI), a leading resource in the evaluation of amateur baseball talent and draft coverage, has ranked Aaron Crow the #41 prospect in the 2009 MLB Draft.  View his free scouting report (with video) at withthefirstpick.net/aaron-crow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real Baseball Intelligence (RBI), a leading resource in the evaluation of amateur baseball talent and draft coverage, has ranked Aaron Crow the #41 prospect in the 2009 MLB Draft.  View his free scouting report (with video) at withthefirstpick.net/aaron-crow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.thelosscolumn.com/2009/the-next-opening-days/comment-page-1/#comment-28291</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelosscolumn.com/?p=3184#comment-28291</guid>
		<description>Aaron Crow will be well beneath where we draft, and given his treatment of the Nationals, I don&#039;t really want him. It looks like if we are doing best available pick for the first round, we&#039;ll be stuck with a prep pitcher, which I hate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron Crow will be well beneath where we draft, and given his treatment of the Nationals, I don&#8217;t really want him. It looks like if we are doing best available pick for the first round, we&#8217;ll be stuck with a prep pitcher, which I hate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.thelosscolumn.com/2009/the-next-opening-days/comment-page-1/#comment-28290</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelosscolumn.com/?p=3184#comment-28290</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&#039;#comment-28285&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Greg&lt;/a&gt; - That&#039;s fair. It&#039;s a big jump to Frederick, though, and there aren&#039;t a lot of quality position players in Frederick this year...it&#039;s going to hurt them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='#comment-28285' rel="nofollow">@Greg</a> &#8211; That&#8217;s fair. It&#8217;s a big jump to Frederick, though, and there aren&#8217;t a lot of quality position players in Frederick this year&#8230;it&#8217;s going to hurt them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
