<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Loss Column -- Baltimore&#039;s Independent Sports Talk Alternative -- a Baltimore Sports Blog and Community &#187; golf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelosscolumn.com/category/golf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelosscolumn.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 03:51:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rory McIlroy Was Amazing, But Golf&#8217;s Still Not a Sport</title>
		<link>http://www.thelosscolumn.com/2011/rory-mcilroy-was-amazing-but-golfs-still-not-a-sport/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelosscolumn.com/2011/rory-mcilroy-was-amazing-but-golfs-still-not-a-sport/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 02:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neal s</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[by Neal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[golf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelosscolumn.com/?p=9675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spent some time Saturday night catching up on news. Inevitably, that meant reading a little bit about Rory McIlroy&#8216;s performance at the US Open. I&#8217;m no fan of golf yet I couldn&#8217;t help but marvel at what the kid had accomplished. Now that he&#8217;s won in historic fashion I think it goes down as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thelosscolumn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Rory_McIlroy.jpg"><img src="http://www.thelosscolumn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Rory_McIlroy.jpg" alt="" title="Rory McIlroy" width="180" height="240" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-9683" /></a>I spent some time Saturday night catching up on news. Inevitably, that meant reading a little bit about <strong>Rory McIlroy</strong>&#8216;s performance at the <strong>US Open</strong>. I&#8217;m no fan of golf yet I couldn&#8217;t help but marvel at what the kid had accomplished. Now that he&#8217;s <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/golf/usopen11/news/story?id=6678101">won in historic fashion</a> I think it goes down as one of the more noteworthy feats we&#8217;ve seen in some time.</p>
<p>And yet, it leaves me cold.</p>
<p>I respect the hell out of quality golfers. Anyone who&#8217;s ever picked up a club knows how hard it is to be proficient, let alone good. To get to the level McIlroy is at &#8212; and to do it at just 22 &#8212; is impressive, indeed. But I can&#8217;t get excited about it the same way I get excited about other sports. Reason being that I don&#8217;t think of golf as a sport.</p>
<p>I say that for one simple reason: to win in golf one needn&#8217;t actually beat anyone but himself.</p>
<p>Sure, there&#8217;s a leaderboard. Every player has a score and the goal is, obviously, to post the best one. But that&#8217;s just it. When the competition is internal &#8212; do your <em>own</em> best, <em>by yourself</em>, and hope it&#8217;s better than <em>someone else&#8217;s</em> best, <em>by himself</em> &#8212; that means you&#8217;re playing a game, not a sport.</p>
<p>The essence of sport is direct competition between individuals or teams. It&#8217;s push and pull, action and reaction. Results are not contingent solely on what one person or team does &#8212; they are mitigated or enhanced by the other side. A great fielder can take away what might have otherwise been a base hit. A cornerback can turn a touchdown pass into a turnover. A jump shot can be blocked. A great serve in tennis only goes as far as the opponent&#8217;s ability to return it, or not. </p>
<p>Take, for example, auto racing &#8212; another activity sometimes derided as &#8220;not a sport&#8221;. If auto racing was golf then time trials would determine the winner. Get the right setup, run the fastest lap(s), and hope your best is <em>the</em> best. But in auto racing they call that &#8220;qualifying&#8221;, not racing. The champion is decided in traffic.</p>
<p>Golf is a game played against the course and the elements, not against other golfers. There&#8217;s plenty to appreciate about that, for sure, but following the leaderboard as one golfer tries to post a better score than another is a damn far cry from watching <strong>Roger Federer</strong> trade shots against <strong>Rafael Nadal</strong>, or watching a battle between the <strong>Ravens</strong> and <strong>Steelers</strong>.</p>
<p>Now, admittedly, this gets complicated. Let&#8217;s go back to my auto racing example. Rally racing is exactly what I described &#8212; time trials. If I&#8217;m being intellectually honest then I have to admit that rallying is just like golf. Drivers compete against themselves and the elements but not directly against other drivers.</p>
<p>It gets further complicated if we consider things like gymnastics or figure skating. Both are individual pursuits where the best score is the goal. Are these not sports? By my own logic, no.</p>
<p>And yet none of these trouble me like golf. I can&#8217;t say exactly why. Perhaps it&#8217;s the difference in athleticism, perhaps it&#8217;s just my own personal bias. Probably it&#8217;s a bit of both.</p>
<p>Either way, there&#8217;s no doubt that watching someone play a game at a high level, whatever form it takes, can be exciting and worthy of recognition. That&#8217;s why I found myself intrigued by McIlroy&#8217;s performance. But there <em>is</em> a difference between that and &#8220;sport&#8221;.</p>
<p>Whatever the difference is, I&#8217;ll take direct competition. Something about that just feels bigger and, to me, always will.</p>
<p><em>(photo via Flickr user <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kompuder_dude/4884384156/sizes/s/in/photostream/">kompuder_dude</a>)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelosscolumn.com/2011/rory-mcilroy-was-amazing-but-golfs-still-not-a-sport/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sports Latitudes: Philosophy Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.thelosscolumn.com/2009/the-sports-latitudes-philosophy-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelosscolumn.com/2009/the-sports-latitudes-philosophy-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neal s</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by Neal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[golf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orioles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ravens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelosscolumn.com/?p=2706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who&#8217;s excited by the fact that Tiger Woods is coming back? No? Me neither. You&#8217;ve got to wonder what hardcore golf fans must think when virtually every piece of above-the-fold news their sport makes involves the movements and machinations of one player. It&#8217;s an almost completely irrelevant sport, outside of the fact that a lot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thelosscolumn.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/swimming-with-horses.jpg"><img src="http://www.thelosscolumn.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/swimming-with-horses-150x98.jpg" alt="swimming-with-horses" title="swimming-with-horses" width="150" height="98" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2707" /></a>Who&#8217;s excited by the fact that <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/golf/article5770035.ece"><b>Tiger Woods</b> is coming back</a>? No? Me neither. </p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got to wonder what hardcore golf fans must think when virtually <i>every</i> piece of above-the-fold news their sport makes involves the movements and machinations of one player. It&#8217;s an almost completely irrelevant sport, outside of the fact that a lot of business gets done while playing it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of both tennis and auto racing, though, so maybe I shouldn&#8217;t say a damn thing.</p>
<p>Moving on&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m intrigued by <a href="http://www.meadvilletribune.com/sports/local_story_049232606.html?keyword=topstory">this article from the <i>Meadville Tribune</i></a>, about <b>Cleveland</b> sports figure <b>Sam Rutigliano</b>. In it, he talks about how consistency and continuity are the keys to success in the NFL. I read it and my first thought was that the <b>Ravens</b> are building just the kind of organization he&#8217;s talking about, and he&#8217;s right. I&#8217;m thinking that it will be the Steelers and Ravens at the top of the AFC North for a long time to come. Maybe whether or not Ray Lewis re-signs.</p>
<p>Jumping off the NFL and its annual free agent carousel, did you see that <b>Pink Sox</b> owner <a href="http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20090219/ARTICLE/902190374/2050/SPORTS?Title=Red-Sox-owner-wants-salary-cap"><b>John Henry</b> is calling for a salary cap</a>, going so far as to call it &#8220;inevitable&#8221;?</p>
<p>Of course we know he&#8217;s just about the least credible source you could find on this issue, but it&#8217;s still interesting that he&#8217;s putting it out there. I&#8217;m curious as to where you all stand: good idea or bad?</p>
<p>This has nothing to do with Big Issues, but I thought it worth noting that <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090219.WBbaseball20090219133459/WBStory/WBbaseball">the <b>Blue Jays</b> have outrighted <b>Brian Burres</b></a>. That&#8217;s how you spell AAAA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelosscolumn.com/2009/the-sports-latitudes-philosophy-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

